Rain Year

  • Jul: 0.00"
  • Jun: 0.61"
  • May: 0.72"
  • Apr: 1.10"
  • Mar: 3.01"
  • Feb: 1.72"
  • Jan: 10.41"
  • Dec: 9.15"
  • Nov: 4.01"
  • Oct: 4.03"
  • Sep: 1.12"

Sundries



Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 09/2003

April 23, 2008

What Did He View and Why?

Last month, a former Mt. Angel Seminary student--Juan González--was arrested during a traffic stop near Yakima WA.  Turns out he was wanted in Oregon on charges of viewing child pornography (previous blog here).  After counseling him on his problems at the seminary, the bishop at the Yakima Diocese hired him to work with adults at a retreat center.  The bishop claims he didn't know that González was eventually charged in Oregon or that he ended up providing religious instruction to children.

Soon, the accused will be back in Oregon to face the charges.

A fugitive warrant from Oregon for Juan Jose González Rios was dismissed in Yakima County Superior Court Tuesday, and the $80,000 bail requirement was waived.

In return, González, 37, agreed to appear June 5 in Marion County, Ore., for arraignment on the child pornography charges.

However, González was not released from the county jail Tuesday because he still faces a hearing on his immigration status with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

González, who emigrated from Jalisco, Mexico, more than 15 years ago, has been living here on a religious visa that expired in 2005.

His attorney, J.J. Sandlin, said González will travel to Tacoma for the immigration hearing sometime in the next week. If ICE allows bail, González could be released from jail and live with his family in Tieton until he has to appear in court in Oregon.

Oregon evidently trusts González.  For reasons still unknown, the Oregon warrant remains sealed.  Hmmm.

Sandlin has emphasized from the beginning that his client is innocent of all charges.

In an earlier interview, Sandlin said González became highly distressed at the seminary because he allegedly witnessed inappropriate sexual behavior on the part of instructors and fellow students there.

The González family also alleges that he was a victim in his early 20s of sexual abuse by a Cowiche priest who has since left the state.

"Juan is a victim and a scapegoat," said his sister, Bertha González, saying that her brother told diocesan officials about the alleged abuse.

And as we know, Sandlin also claims that his client never intended to look at kiddie porn and that "whatever he did was his attempt to get away from those people in the seminary."  Or as this coverage put it...

He says he's innocent, and that the diocese set him up.
His attorney JJ Sandlin won't say much on the status of those porn charges, except that he's on amicable terms with Marion county prosecutors.
He says... they're negotiating.

Curious.

April 02, 2008

Just an Isolated Episode...

Last month, a traffic stop near Yakima resulted in the arrest of a former seminary student.

Juan Jose Gonzalez, 37, of Cowiche is being held on $80,000 bail at the Yakima County Jail on a fugitive warrant issued in Marion County, Ore. He faces four charges of encouraging child sex abuse, a felony, according to Yakima County Superior Court records.

...

The allegations stem from when Gonzalez was a student at Mount Angel Seminary in Mount Angel, Ore. He was dismissed from the seminary in 2003, but Oregon authorities did not issue an arrest warrant until 2005.

We have yet to learn why the delay between his dismissal and the arrest warrant regarding child porn.   

Following that dismissal, Gonzalez went back home and sought work in the local diocese.  And wouldn't you know...

Bishop Carlos Sevilla said he hired Gonzalez in 2003 to work part-time at the St. Peter Retreat Center in Cowiche because he viewed the incident as an "isolated episode," and because the job involved administrative work and teaching religious education to adults only, not children. Gonzalez was hired as full-time retreat director later that summer.

"It was a serious error in judgment on my part to employ Mr. Gonzalez while he was under investigation," Sevilla said in a statement. "I have always been and continue to be deeply committed to keeping the church a safe place. I should not have hired the employee, regret my serious failure in good judgment in doing so, and take full responsibility for my actions."

A safe place for whom?  By 2003, the sex abuse scandals in the Catholic Church had been national headlines for awhile.  The Yakima Diocese has paid out $1.25 million regarding accusations involving seven priests.  Hopefully Gonzalez hasn't done anything to merit more settlements.   

"My client shall prove his innocence to all criminal charges, and he shall provide specific facts in a court of law that establishes his truthfulness and his innocence," said J.J. Sandlin, attorney for Gonzalez.

Sandlin said (Bishop) Sevilla was well aware of his client's history at the seminary, including his client's allegations of sexual misconduct by priests providing theological instruction there. Sevilla also knew Gonzalez has had contact with Catholic youth at the Cowiche retreat for several years.

Sevilla said the diocese only recently learned that Gonzalez had been providing some religious instruction to youth. An outside investigator will be hired to determine if there are any allegations of inappropriate conduct.

And switching links...

Gonzalez is innocent of the charges, Sandlin said. He said Gonzalez never intended to look at "kiddie porn," but he wouldn't elaborate beyond saying that Gonzalez was under duress at the Oregon seminary.

"Whatever he did was his attempt to get away from those people in the seminary," Sandlin said.

??

Sevilla acknowledged that he should have followed up on the 2003 letter from the Oregon seminary.

"I didn't even think about it again until he was imprisoned," Sevilla said Tuesday.

Irresponsible.  Returning to the first link... 

According to a statement from the diocese, Sevilla did not inform the pastors in the Cowiche parish about the allegations against Gonzalez. Sevilla also did not notify the diocese Lay Advisory Board, charged with advising the bishop about matters pertaining to the sexual abuse of minors.

...

Robert Fontana of Voice of the Faithful, a support group for church-abuse victims and priests and church members seeking changes in the diocese, said the latest case fits a pattern of secrecy surrounding the Yakima diocese.

Fontana served as director of evangelization for the diocese from 1991-2005, before resigning over complaints that the bishop was mishandling abuse and child pornography cases.

Sevilla has been the bishop at Yakima since '96.  At least he hasn't been promoted. 

January 03, 2008

Yet More Victims of Jesuit Priests

Last November, the Society of Jesus, Oregon Province paid $50 million to settle with 110 Alaska Natives who'd claimed they were sexually abused by Jesuit priests (previous blog here).  Unfortunately, there are several chapters in that sordid book.  Today, the order announced that it will pay $4.8 million to 16 victims in Eastern Washington.

The Jesuits operated St. Mary's Mission and School near Omak for more than 60 years until turning it over to the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation in 1973. The tribes now operate the school as the Paschal Sherman Indian School.

The 15 women and one man claimed they were sexually abused by a school superior and a Jesuit worker in the late 1960s and early 1970s. The accusers were elementary school pupils at the time and are now in their 40s and 50s.

"I am profoundly sorry for the pain and suffering of these people, and for the violation of trust which they have felt," the Very Rev. John D. Whitney, head of the Oregon Province, said in a news release.

...

The accused abusers are still alive and living under supervision in Jesuit residences.

Wonder if they're living in the same assisted living facility as, for instance, Reverend James E. Jacobson?  He's the former long-time chaplain at the Oregon State Penitentiary who as we've learned had previously sexually assaulted seven women and fathered four children in rural Eskimo villages in Alaska (most recent blog here).  There are some creepy people living on the Gonzaga University campus.

November 18, 2007

Another Big Settlement for the Victims of Priests

Sadly, the sexual proclivities of Jesuit priests in Alaska have made ripe blogging fodder (examples here, here, and here).  A number of priests made native villages their perverted playgrounds.

Attorneys for more than a hundred people who say they were victims of abuse involving Jesuits in Alaska announced Sunday they have reached a $50 million settlement with the regional Jesuit province.

The 110 people, all Alaska Natives, said they were abused by 15 Jesuit priests, brothers or those supervised by Jesuits from about 1961 to 1987, said Ken Roosa, their Anchorage-based attorney.

Roosa said his clients ranged in age from about 5 to 16 when they were abused, and the abuse occurred in remote villages along the coast of Western Alaska and along the Yukon River.

"In some villages, it is difficult to find an adult who was not sexually violated by men who used religion and power" to abuse and silence the children, Roosa said in a statement. "For our clients, this settlement represents a long overdue acknowledgment of the truth of their stories of abuse."

Officials at the Society of Jesus, Oregon Province—the formal name of the Jesuits in the Northwest—would neither confirm nor deny the settlement Sunday, saying details had yet to be worked out.

Between the Province and the Archdiocese, imagine the manpower decisions that were being made by the Catholic hierarchies in Portland.

In the past several years, many cases have been filed against the Jesuits in the Northwest, and the province has considered filing for bankruptcy. It is not clear how Sunday's announcement would affect any bankruptcy decision.

Excluding the Sunday announcement, the Oregon Province—which includes Washington, Alaska, Oregon, Montana and Idaho—has spent about $16 million to settle claims with 61 victims against 41 priests since 2002.

...

Most of the cases filed against the Oregon Province have involved those serving in Alaska. For years, the Jesuits had sent priests to serve in remote Alaskan villages and some victims' attorneys have contended that Alaska was where Jesuit leaders sent troubled priests—a contention Whitney, head of the Oregon Province, has vehemently denied.

He also denies that Jesuit leadership ignored the abuse.  But with everything that's already come to light...   

March 03, 2007

Former Oregon Priest a Father of Four

In 2005, Father James Jacobson retired after 25 years as chaplain in residence at the Oregon State Penitentiary.  Shortly thereafter, DNA evidence showed that he had fathered two sons while a Jesuit priest in Alaska (previous blog here).  He had served in several Eskimo villages in remote parts of Alaska from the early '60s until 1976.

His sons (and the one surviving mother) filed a lawsuit against the Fairbanks diocese, seeking child support.  They claimed that the mothers (who were both married at the time) had been sexually assaulted and that the diocese knew of Jacobson's problems but destroyed the evidence.  A transcript of Jacobson's deposition, filed yesterday, was an eye-opener.

A retired Catholic priest accused of sexual assault has revealed startling new information about his behavior decades ago while in rural Alaska, including that he fathered four children, carried on sexual relations with seven village women, and visited prostitutes during trips to Anchorage and Fairbanks.

...

Jacobson said he frequented prostitutes in those cities when he was principal of the old Copper Valley School near Glennallen. That's a Jesuit boarding school that closed in 1971.

The women were street walkers and they'd usually go to a motel or his car, Jacobson said. He paid the prostitutes with church funds, he said.

"Well, it was the Jesuits' money. It was money that was given to me for, you know, the work I was doing," Jacobson testified.

Two of the seven women were teens.  And now we know why Jacobson retired from the Oregon State Penitentiary and relocated to a Jesuit assisted living facility for clergy on the Gonzaga University campus in Spokane...

DNA testing done in 2005 proved that Jacobson is the father of the two men now suing. When the results came back, the Oregon-based head of the region's Jesuits directed him to move into the retirement home in Washington, where he could be watched more closely, he said.

Jacobson testified that he didn't recall having sex with one of the women who had his child but didn't doubt that it happened, because of the test results. He disputed her assertion that he sexually assaulted her.

"I believe--I know that I didn't force her. I don't remember any particular time that I had a sexual relationship with her, but I'm positive I didn't force her or anybody else."

Cooke asked him how he could be so sure if he didn't even remember her.

"Just, I know my actions," Jacobson responded. Later, he added: "As far as my forcing any woman to have sex with me, I know I haven't, I didn't." 

By the way, the regional Jesuit headquarters--the Society of Jesus Oregon Province, is in Portland.  It oversees the order in Alaska, Idaho, Montana, Oregon, and Washington.

He disclosed that he knew of two other children he had fathered in Alaska besides those in the lawsuit. One mother didn't keep the child, a boy. He wanted to help the other child, a daughter, and went to where the mother was living with her parents.

"And they asked me not to come around or not to bother them, or I'm not sure what the words were, but that was the idea, that they were embarrassed by me coming around," he testified.

The mothers' families would take care of the children, he said.

He said he didn't know he had fathered two other children until the DNA testing in 2005.

Cooke is the lawyer for the plaintiffs.  The two sons are suing for $325,000 and $270,000.  If that sounds beyond the reach of a humble priest (from this link)...

Among items he (the judge) will decide is whether the statute of limitations on bringing a lawsuit had expired and whether Jacobson's vow of poverty and transfer of earnings and other assets to his religious order, and its obligations to provide for him, can make it liable for unpaid child support.

Jacobson has turned his earnings over to the Society of Jesus Oregon Province, which covers Alaska, and attorneys for the order say it is not liable for a child support debt.

...

Since his children were born, Jacobson received more than $1.5 million in salary and pension, but it all went to the Jesuits, and neither he nor the religious order gave his children any money, the lawsuit says.

Jesuits priests take a vow of poverty...over $1.5 million!?!

This lawsuit is one of more than 80 filed against priests who served in the Fairbanks Catholic Diocese. 

August 13, 2006

Damage Control at the Diocese of Santa Rosa

Three-plus months after it happened, the bishop in Santa Rosa CA is finally apologizing for failing to take aggressive action (previous blog here) against a priest who'd admitted to sexually molesting children for years.  That gave the predator priest time and opportunity to flee (probably to Mexico); he still hasn't been found.  The written apology was distributed at Saturday and Sunday services throughout the Diocese of Santa Rosa, which includes the coastal counties from Sonoma through Del Norte (on the Oregon border) plus Lake County.

Catholic Bishop Daniel Walsh apologized to parishioners Saturday for his delay in reporting alleged sexual abuse by fugitive priest Xavier Ochoa.

In a one-page statement, Walsh said he had put "caution" before "doing the right thing."

"I made an error in judgment by waiting to report Rev. Ochoa's admission," Walsh wrote. "I should have acted immediately, and not delayed. For this I am deeply sorry."

Originally in response to a question on why he didn't contact the authorities sooner, Bishop Walsh claimed that, "It didn't even cross my mind. But when you're dealing with a crisis, you don't think about those things. I wanted to make sure that he didn't function as a priest, so he didn't have access to kids."  As I've noted previously, considering the sad recent history at the diocese when it comes to pedophile priests, such an excuse is ridiculous...the leadership there had to be well versed in the rules on how to respond to such situations.

In his statement, Walsh acknowledged that his public admission could bring criminal charges for violating state mandatory reporting laws for suspected child sexual abuse.

State law requires clergy members and others to report abuse "immediately or as soon as practicably possible by telephone" and to follow up by fax or e-mail within 36 hours.

"As the District Attorney reviews the actions of all involved in this horrible situation, my admission of failing to report the case immediately could cause me to be charged with a misdemeanor having a potential penalty of 6 months in jail and/or a $1,000 fine," wrote Walsh. "If I am found guilty for not taking immediate action, I will accept whatever punishment is imposed."

The Sonoma County District Attorney's Office has been investigating the situation and is considering filing such charges.  So, this isn't a brave admission, it's a simple statement of fact.

Walsh's statement came seven weeks after he issued a letter to parishioners -- his first public comment on the Ochoa allegations and his handling of the situation -- saying he had "acted in good faith and ... with reasonable speed to notify authorities."

The bishop has refused interview requests since the Ochoa controversy began, and a diocese spokeswoman said Saturday he would not be available to comment.

...

In what was titled "a candid message," Walsh lamented the damage caused to the church by his delayed reporting.

"We have made great strides in dealing with and combating sexual abuse by church personnel. I cannot let this hard work be spoiled by the actions of one bad priest," wrote Walsh. "And I will not allow my own error to interfere with the path we have taken, and on which we must remain, to create a church community in which we can take pride."

Walsh said he was compelled to admit his error for the sake of the church.

"With this letter," he wrote, "I am choosing to step forward and admit my mistake because not to do so would only compound my original inaction and further tarnish all of our shared efforts over the past six years, in working to eradicate sexual abuse in the Church."

It may be only one bad priest this time (we hope), but it sure looks like the leadership hasn't changed.  The Bishop's actions enabled the priest to hide, and since then Bishop has shied away from the press and public.  His "candid message" is very late, and unless the press coverage skipped over it, included nothing about the victims. 

Has the church really made great strides in combating sexual abuse?  If so, it shouldn't be so hard to tell.  Heavy sigh...

Update:  Turns out that a PR firm helped write the letter.

July 30, 2006

Covering Up More Priest Problems

Today we have a pair of stories about the Catholic Church that show the continuation of a sad trend--covering up for rogue priests.  First...

Santa Rosa Bishop Daniel Walsh said it didn't occur to him to immediately report to police that priest Xavier Ochoa had admitted sexual misconduct with young boys, as required by law.

Walsh said his first concern was to remove Ochoa from any contact with children and said he was not focused on making a report. It wasn't until four days after the admission that a diocese lawyer notified the Sonoma County Sheriff's Department.

By the time deputies began looking for him, Ochoa had fled. He is believed to be in Mexico.

As for calling authorities sooner, Walsh said, "It didn't even cross my mind. But when you're dealing with a crisis, you don't think about those things. I wanted to make sure that he didn't function as a priest, so he didn't have access to kids."

The Sonoma County District Attorney's Office has ordered an investigation into whether the bishop and other Roman Catholic Church officials violated the state law that requires immediate notification by telephone of sex abuse suspicions.

When Bishop Walsh arrived at the Santa Rosa diocese six years ago, it was struggling with sexual (and financial) scandals.  Clearly folks hoped such ugliness was behind them.  Yet we're supposed to believe that Walsh and the diocese learned nothing from the process?  The Bishop claims he ensured that Ochoa no longer had access to children, but that somehow didn't include anyone keeping watch on him.  Let's hope this isn't another example of an underground railroad for perverted priests (previous blogs here and here). 

The various felonies Ochoa has been charged with include "lewd acts with a child, forcible sodomy and oral copulation" with three victims...whose attorney says there are as many as nine victims.  The details of victim #3 are grizzly.  The diocese notified Child Protective Services the day before it faxed notification to the Sheriff's Department.  It looks like all Walsh can be charged with is "failing to immediately report allegations of sex abuse," a misdemeanor.

The following cover-up involves a rather different scenario.

A priest who resigned from a church in an affluent Connecticut community misspent up to $1.4 million in parishioner donations to lead a life of luxury with another man, according to a church-directed investigation.

The Rev. Michael Jude Fay spent church money on limousines, stays at top hotels, jewelry, Italian clothing and a Florida condominium shared with the other man, auditors hired by the diocese found. About half the money he spent was kept in a secret bank account, according to their report, which was mailed Friday to 1,700 parishioners of the Darien church and obtained in advance by The Associated Press.

Bridgeport Bishop William Lori, who ordered the investigation by Deloitte Financial Advisory Services, said he was shocked and angered by the findings. The report also was sent to federal authorities.

...

The report describes a parish finance council that did not meet regularly in recent years, largely because of Fay's health and absences from the parish. Fay was diagnosed with cancer in 2001 and frequently cited his health when asked about church finances, the report states.

Lori has faced criticism for his handling of the scandal, especially when it emerged that another priest and the church bookkeeper hired a private investigator to look into Fay. The pair said they hired the investigator in May after they met with Lori and Fay was not removed, according to the report.

Lori said after he was made aware of potential financial misconduct in late April he took swift action to stop Fay from using church credit cards and then to force his resignation.

Fay is a 55-year-old priest who'd been at the Darien parish for 15 years and spent his entire career in the SW corner of Connecticut.  For at least several of those years, he's been seeing a Philadelphia wedding planner a year his junior named Clifford Martell...though he often goes by the last name of Fantini.  For a man who knew he couldn't come out of the closet, Fay wasn't exactly discrete...many examples here.   

Last October is when Bishop Lori says he became aware of financial problems at the Darien church...though there certainly were suspicions within the parish before then.  Bishop Lori left Fay in charge, claiming he thought it might be "mismanagement" or "inattention to administration."  Over the next few months, the parish check register shows several questionable expenditures.  Meanwhile, the parish hadn't paid its cathra draticum (7 percent tax on weekly donations) for several months.

And then in late March (from this link)...

Father Fay wrote to a few of the parish's wealthiest families. "I am privately writing to a small group of households to ask you a very special favor," his solicitation letter began. "Throughout the course of this past year, many unexpected and difficult bills have thrown our parish coffers into turmoil."

"Would you please consider donating $50,000 to St. John Church now," the letter continues, "so that I can get us back on our feet while the future plans are designed?"

"Your generosity is legend," the letter says. "Your kindness and support is so appreciated. I absolutely do not enjoy this part of my 'job' but I must ask."

A small church that was receiving $1 million in donations per year was constantly being called by creditors.  It hadn't paid its employee medical plan or self-insurance premiums for several months and was 18 months behind on a small bank loan.  Finally on April 28, an associate pastor (Rev. Michael Madden) and the parish bookkeeper (Bethany D'Erario) took the financial records to the diocese and spoke at length with the chief financial officer.  Yet on May 9, it was clear to them that Fay had kept his job.

So, Rev. Madden and D'Erario decided to use their own money to hire a private detective.  On May 17, that private detective announced that after doing a partial check of just two years of church records, he'd found at least $200,000 of improper expenditures, most of them on Fantini.  So, the detective took the records to the local police.  Bishop Lori asked for and Rev. Fay provided his resignation later that day.  The diocese now says that it doesn't know where Fay is and can only contact him via his attorney...but it's providing him a "modest stipend" for living expenses.  From this link...

On May 21, the Sunday after Fay's resignation, Lori attended the 10 a.m. Mass at St. John's to apologize to parishioners. During the homily, Lori told parishioners a "considerable portion" of their offerings had been used to fund a lifestyle that no follower of Christ, particularly a priest, should lead.

"The priesthood is a higher calling, so a priest is required, at a minimum, to lead a moral life and follow the teachings of the church," McAleer said Friday. "Clearly, that wasn't the case with Father Fay."

Bishop Lori apologized to the parishioners, condemning the gay priest's lifestyle.  Bishop Walsh maintained a public silence about his child molesting priest until the pressure got so great that he started defending himself as noted above, including highlighting his "zero tolerance policy for child abuse."  Something is really wrong with this picture.

When Rev. Madden admitted to the parishioners that it was he and D'Erario who hired the private detective, Bishop Lori got very angry at him for going outside of church channels.  However, the parishioners turned out in force to support Madden, fearing that the diocese would soon quietly fire him.  Both he and D'Erario still have their jobs, at least at the moment.

Back to the initial article on Fay...

The report, which was limited to the past six years, calculated the "potential financial loss" at $1.4 million. The review also identified an additional $350,000 deposited in Fay's personal account, but could not determine the source of the money.

...

Fay shopped at Bergdorf Goodman, Saks Fifth Avenue and Nordstrom, drove a Jaguar, attended a sports club, bought jewelry from Cartier, spent $130,000 for limo rides for himself and his mother and stayed at hotels such as the Ritz Carlton, Hotel De Paris and the Four Seasons Hotel, the auditors found. He spent tens of thousands of dollars on home furnishings and meals and more than $20,000 to mark the 25th anniversary of his ordination, according to the report.

Fay paid Fantini and his production firm $10,000, claiming the money was for video filming and decorations for the church. No invoices were supplied to verify the claim, the report said.

Fay also invested in a Philadelphia condo with Fantini and said some of the furniture he bought was used in Fantini's residence.

The report also cites $257,000 for the purchase of the Florida property and $87,000 to rent an apartment in New York. Fay said he rented the apartment while he was treated for cancer there, but later admitted he began renting the apartment before he was diagnosed with cancer, the report said.

Too bad the Catholic Church can't (and wouldn't) put the embezzled money from Darien towards helping the victims in Santa Rosa.  To bad the Church's natural inclination continues to be to cover up rather than confront issues like these.

November 18, 2005

Keeping the Religious Right Energized

This nation goes back and forth--slowly--on subjects like this.  Too bad people on both sides can't be more tolerant.

An atheist who has spent four years trying to ban the Pledge of Allegiance from being recited in public schools is now challenging the motto printed on U.S. currency because it refers to God.

Michael Newdow seeks to remove "In God We Trust" from U.S. coins and dollar bills, claiming in a federal lawsuit filed Thursday that the motto is an unconstitutional endorsement of religion.

Newdow, a Sacramento doctor and lawyer, used a similar argument when he challenged the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools because it contains the words "under God."

We shall soon see if the Supreme Court takes the case this time.  If it doesn't, the 9th Circuit has ruled for Newdow. 

I've got a cousin and his family who'd be pleased by such a result, though for a different reason.  They won't say the pledge of allegiance because they're Jehovah's Witnesses.

Congress first authorized a reference to God on a two-cent piece in 1864. The action followed a request by the director of the U.S. Mint, who wrote there should be a "distinct and unequivocal national recognition of the divine sovereignty" on the nation's coins.

In 1955, the year after Congress inserted the words "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance, Congress required all currency to carry the motto "In God We Trust."

"The placement of 'In God We Trust' on the coins and currency was clearly done for religious purposes and to have religious effects," Newdow wrote in the 162-page lawsuit he filed against Congress.

You can read a lengthier history here of how "In God We Trust" came to be put on U.S. currency. Congress made "In God We Trust" the national motto in 1956.  "E pluribus unum" (out of many, one) is also a national motto, having never officially lost the status it had before "In God We Trust." 

Newdow's latest lawsuit came five days after the U.S. Supreme Court rejected, without comment, a challenge to an inscription of "In God We Trust" on a North Carolina county government building.

In doing so, the justices upheld the Richmond, Va.-based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which ruled that "In God We Trust" appears on the nation's coins and is a national motto.

"In this situation, the reasonable observer must be deemed aware of the patriotic uses, both historical and present, of the phrase 'In God We Trust,'" the appeals panel ruled in upholding the inscription's display.

I've always figured that if people are truly secure in their beliefs, they wouldn't care about such issues...except maybe when it comes to the time, money, etc. wasted battling over them.  Some traditions though do have value.  I guess what we're waiting on the courts to tell us is if whether mentioning God in the pledge of allegiance (and maybe on currency) is tradition or a bad habit.  I'm sure whatever the Supreme Court says, or fails to say, somebody will sue in search of a different answer.

November 12, 2005

Resisting Extradition

A number of priests accused of pedophilia in various nations have sought to avoid the charges by hiding and/or resisting extradition.  Last year, the Dallas Morning News did an excellent series on some these runaway priests, even noting where it found several of the accused. 

In some cases, church officials deliberately reassigned priests to get them away from the accusations.  Appallingly, a few of these priests got access to children at their next assignments...and were moved yet again.  In a few instances, superiors have suggested their priests go face the charges, but won't order them to do so.  Such is the case with Joseph Henn, a member of the Salvatorian Order who lives and works in the Order's headquarters near the Vatican. 

Henn was indicted in 2003 for allegedly molesting three boys in Phoenix AZ in 1979-80.  He was already working in Rome when the 13-count indictment came down, so the Salvatorian Order placed him on restricted duty.  Henn claims he's innocent, but refuses to travel to Phoenix to face the charges.  He was placed under house arrest by Italian officials this past July, and yesterday, his extradition proceedings began in Rome.  He fears for his life if imprisoned in Arizona.   

The lawyer for a fugitive American priest wanted in the United States on charges of sexually molesting boys urged an Italian court on Friday not to send his client home because he risked being killed in prison.

The Rev. Joseph Henn, 56, wanted by authorities in Arizona since 2003, has been living under house arrest at the headquarters of his religious order in Rome.

"If he is extradited to America he risks his life because prisoners in Arizona do not like priests accused of pedophilia," attorney Michele Gentiloni Silverij told reporters at an extradition hearing.

...

As the scandal swept across the United States the finances of many American dioceses have been hit by multimillion-dollar lawsuits by those claiming to have been molested by priests when they were children or teenagers. The next hearing in Henn's case was scheduled for Jan 26 so the court can receive more documents from the United States.

Henn is not the only priest fighting extradition to face molestation charges in Phoenix.  Father Patrick Colleary, staying on a family farm in Ireland, fears the prison conditions in the Phoenix area, though for somewhat different reasons. 

...Colleary is asking for a "permanent prohibition on extradition...due to alleged cruel, inhuman, and unconstitutional conditions...in particular in Maricopa County."  The chief solicitor brings up Sheriff Joe Arpaio's policy of making inmates wear pink underwear.  And it criticizes the recent transfer of inmates from the old Madison Street Jail to the new jail. During that transfer the inmates were kept in their underwear in the streets of downtown Phoenix. This apparently was played up in the Irish media.

The sheriff there has long kept his prisoners, whether accused or convicted, in pink underwear...and on hot days, the prisoners strip down to it to keep cool.  During that transfer, the prisoners were also wearing pink flip-flops and handcuffs.  When hearing of the flap with the Irish government over the extradition, the sheriff was unapologetic.

Arpaio downplayed the dispute and vowed not to change a thing.

"I don't see what the problem with pink underwear is," he said. "The pictures were taken on county property when we were moving from one jail to the other. But I'm not changing anything when this guy comes into the jail. He will be wearing pink underwear."

To help improve the odds of extradition, the County Attorney's Office has offered to keep Colleary in federal custody while awaiting trial.

Of course, on something on all runaway priests' minds is the pre-meditated murder of John Geoghan, a convicted pedophile priest from the Archdiocese of Boston.  He was killed in a minimum-security prison by a man serving a life sentence for murdering a gay man.  Notice how the local district attorney also thinks that homosexuality and forcing sex on pre-pubescent boys are somehow related.

The suspect in the prison cell slaying of defrocked pedophile priest John Geoghan hated homosexuals and planned the killing weeks in advance, a prosecutor said Monday.

Joseph L. Druce, a fellow inmate in the maximum security Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center in Shirley, even tore apart a book to make a tool for jamming the door of Geoghan's cell, Worcester District Attorney John J. Conte said.

Druce "has a longstanding phobia, it appears, toward homosexuals of any kind. ... He is filled with longstanding hate," Conte said at a news conference in Worcester.

So, while I detest the fact that accused pedophile priests are hiding from the justice system, I can understand a bit of their trepidation.  I wish the guilty ones had thought about that--and a lot of other things--before succumbing to their urges and molesting children. 

October 16, 2005

A Priest with "Surprising" Victims

Unfortunately, the Society of Jesus, Oregon Province has popped up on my radar screen before for the molestation of children (previous blog here).  Now, the Jesuit organization headquartered in Portland is also dealing with alleged rapes by one of its priests, again from a few years ago in remote parts of Alaska. 

By the way, the priest in question retired last year after spending the previous 25 years in Salem as chaplain in residence at the Oregon State Penitentiary.  While there, he also celebrated mass at the Santiam Correctional Institution and the Mill Creek Correctional Facility.

Officials with the Fairbanks Catholic Diocese were surprised by the "new twist" in the most recent civil suit filed against a priest, diocese spokeswoman Ronnie Rosenberg said.

The suit claims the Rev. James E. Jacobson, a Jesuit priest who served more than a decade in western Alaska, sexually assaulted two women, impregnated them and left two sons behind.

Rosenberg said the latest filing came as a surprise because it differs from the more than 80 suits filed so far against priests who served in diocese. Most of those claims allege child sexual abuse.

That's pretty sad when one can consider a priest having sex with adults as a surprise.  That spokeswoman needs to be more careful with how she phrases things.

While diocese officials were surprised, the Rev. John Whitney, provincial of the Oregon Province of the Society of Jesus, said he was recently made aware that Jacobson is the father of the two male complainants.

"We willingly submitted to the (DNA) testing," Whitney said.

DNA test results attached to the complaint show a 99.5 percent probability that John A. Doe and a 99.95 percent probability that John B. Doe are Jacobson's children.

But, Whitney said, the lawsuit marks the first time he has heard anything about sexual assault. Whitney said he finds both the charges and the fact Jacobson violated his priestly vow of chastity upsetting.

"It's a very tough thing," Whitney said. "I continue to want to find a healing path. I am very sorry it has come to this. I am sorry for the pain."

The alleged sexual assaults occurred in the priest's quarters of a Yupik Eskimo village and the rectory of the village church.

Jacobson began his ministry in Alaska in 1963, serving until 1966 in the villages of Tununak, Nightmute and Chefornak. A yearlong break was followed by three years teaching at Copper Valley School. From 1971 through 1976, he served in Hooper Bay, Chevak, Scammon Bay and Cape Romanzof.

...

More than 80 complaints have been filed against the Fairbanks diocese as well as the Jesuits in the last few years, alleging sexual abuse of minors by priests and a brother affiliated with the diocese.

I'm sure these abuses are yet another reason that it's been so difficult for many Native peoples to adjust to Western ways.

The lawsuit asserts that the Fairbanks diocese and the Jesuits were negligent in supervising Jacobson and had knowledge of his "inappropriate and illegal behavior." The lawsuit also claims the diocese and the Jesuits destroyed evidence relating to Jacobson's time in the state.

Rosenberg said the diocese has a small file on Jacobson but doesn't have any records of Jacobson's performance while he served in Alaska.

"We don't have anything on anybody of that vintage, but I will continue to look," she said. "I am sure files have been weeded out. I don't know any place that keeps personnel files from the 1960s and 1970s."

Maybe Rosenberg is telling the truth.  But, it certainly sounds suspicious...and all-too-familiar when dealing with diocese and naughty priests.

Jacobson was still a missionary in Alaska when sent to the Oregon State Penitentiary to "temporarily relieve a priest who was having a hard time with the ministry."  In 2003, Father Jacobson received the National Award for Chaplain of the Year from the Salvation Army, and the Maximillan Kolbe Award from the American Catholic Correctional Chaplain Association. 

Now 82, Jacobson lives at the Regis House--an assisted living facility for clergy on the Gonzaga University campus, where he tends to the needs of other residents.  He is under restriction, not doing "priestly ministry" outside of the Regis House.

My Photo

Search RoguePundit