« And Now for Something Completely Different... | Main | Squeezing the Lottery for Education Dollars »

February 11, 2005

Some Natural "Pollution"

This is an interesting example of how nature can sometimes fool us.

Noxious chemicals found in whale blubber may not be entirely artificial, research shows. Some of the compounds, which resemble the environmentally polluting chemicals we create as flame retardants, may be produced by sponges and other sea creatures.

Scientists have known for years that certain artificial chemicals in the environment can accumulate in animals, especially in predators that eat other contaminated animals. Such tenacious molecules, called halogenated organic compounds, include the toxic pesticide DDT.

Recently, a group of similar compounds was identified in marine animals, but its source was not known. Were these methoxylated polybrominated diphenyl ethers (MeO-PBDEs) the natural products of slow, soft marine creatures, such as sponges? One sponge in the Indian Ocean had been shown to produce a MeO-PBDE, perhaps to deter predators or parasites.

Or were they derived from discarded flame retardants, slightly altered by some biological process on the way? Unaltered flame-retardant molecules have been found in animal and fish tissues, including human breast milk.

Quick correction...halogenated organic compounds are certainly not the only contaminants that can bioaccumulate.  A couple notable examples are mercury and selenium.

Chris Reddy, of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts, sought to answer this question by looking at the different isotopes of carbon in the molecules. MeO-PBDE that had been produced by plants or animals would contain a consistent percentage of radioactive carbon-14, which is present at low levels throughout the ocean.

If, on the other hand, the MeO-PBDE were artificial, it would have been made out of carbons from petroleum that was so old that all the carbon-14 would long since have decayed. "We call it a 'dead or alive' approach," says Reddy.

The idea was simple, but the task was anything but. Reddy's colleague Emma Teuten spent months working with a smelly 10-kilogram sample of blubber from a fatally beached True's beaked whale (Mesoplodon mirus). "I cut the skin off, and diced it and blended it, which gave something the consistency of a strawberry smoothie," she recalls. Then she burned off the fat with acid and isolated small amounts of MeO-PBDEs from it.

Carbon-14 was present in levels consistent with the surrounding ocean, the researchers report in Science. This suggests that the MeO-PBDE was a natural creation, and Reddy's team suggests that it accumulated in the whale after it ate some unknown creature, perhaps a squid, that had in turn gobbled up the organic creator of the chemicals.

And, there could certainly be other species producing the compound that we don't know about yet.  Nature produces all kinds of compounds that we consider pollutants when found in unnatural places or concentrations.  It's just that when we find them in unexpected places, it's usually our fault.   

The researchers' sample size is admittedly small: just one whale, which was probably ill. But marine-mammal toxicologist Paul Ross, of Canada's Institute of Ocean Sciences in Sidney, British Columbia, is impressed. "It seems quite clear," he says.

Reddy says there are larger implications. "We can start to think about how humans and animals and plants have evolved over millions of years. We've only manufactured these compounds since the 1930s. The way we respond to these compounds might have been programmed over many generations." It might explain, he suggests, why some enzymes in the natural world can break down these kinds of molecules.

But the producers of flame retardants and other nasty chemicals are by no means off the hook. Although it is not clear whether MeO-PBDEs are toxic, many similar compounds are dangerous. "We might be adding to an already very complicated soup of chemicals with our own chemicals," says Ross. In the whale that was studied, the compounds of interest were less abundant than their nastier artificial cousins.

I agree that despite the tiny sample size, the science behind the findings is very clear.  But, it's also clear that concentrations of MeO-PBDEs in the environment are rising, and that's man's fault.  These compounds haven't been proven to cause health problems, but they are related to compounds which do.  So, that's cause for concern and additional research. 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d67c69e200e550386f008834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Some Natural "Pollution":

» Carnival of the Vanities #126 from Soccer Dad
Welcome to Carnival of the Vanities #126. Before we start out little excursion around the blogosphere there are a few things to get out of the way. First of all thanks to Silflay Hraka for originating Carnival of the Vanities... [Read More]

» Carnival of the Vanities #126 from Soccer Dad
Welcome to Carnival of the Vanities #126. Before we start out little excursion around the blogosphere there are a few things to get out of the way. First of all thanks to Silflay Hraka for originating Carnival of the Vanities... [Read More]

Comments

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

My Photo

Search RoguePundit